FEATURE
Final Expansion of
California’s Celebrated
Groundwater
Replenishment Project
James H. Clark, Jeff Neemann, Mehul Patel, and Robert Thompson
Final Expansion of
California’s Celebrated
Groundwater
Replenishment Project
James H. Clark, Jeff Neemann, Mehul Patel, and Robert Thompson
Final Expansion of
California’s Celebrated
Groundwater
Replenishment Project
James H. Clark, Jeff Neemann, Mehul Patel, and Robert Thompson
42 JOURNAL AWWA • APRIL 2025
Key Takeaways
After two expansions since its
opening in 2008, Southern
Californias Groundwater
Replenishment System is at its
goal capacity of 130 mgd.
Through rigorous simulations
and full-scale testing, two special
districts determined the best
materials, methods, and designs
to overcome challenges to
ensure peak performance from
the expansion.
Efficiencies gained with
improved methods, advanced
technologies, and reviving an old
pipeline could save the districts
millions in energy costs.
Layout imagery by OCWD
JOURNAL AWWA • APRIL 2025 43
15518833, 2025, 3, Downloaded from https://awwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/awwa.2419, Wiley Online Library on [19/03/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
FEATURE Groundwater Replenishment in California
44 JOURNAL AWWA • APRIL 2025
A
s many aquifers around the world continue
to be depleted, especially in the western and
southwestern United States, a system that
can restore 130 mgd of processed water to
a region’s aquifer is getting plenty of attention. The
Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) in Southern
California first went into operation in 2008 and went
through two subsequent expansions. The GWRS has
become more than the worlds largest wastewater purifi-
cation system for indirect potable reuse—it just may be
the worlds most documented and toured water facility.
The plant draws visitors who safely sample the water, at
times with significant publicity. In 2014, 60 Minutes corre-
spondent Lesley Stahl visited the GWRS for the televised
news magazine’s segment about the plant’s innovative
designs. Stahl filled a clear plastic cup with processed water
that a mere 45 minutes earlier had been sewage. Her unvar-
nished critique, on camera: “To tell the truth, it wasn’t bad.
The GWRS is a collaborative effort of the Orange County
Water District (OCWD) and the Orange County Sanitation
District (OC San); Black & Veatch provided final design,
planning, and construction support. The plant came on
line as a 70-mgd facility and added another 30 mgd with
its initial expansion in 2015. Another 30-mgd expansion
that began in 2020 brought the plant to its final 130-mgd
goal, using a variety of designs that optimized the oper-
ations, saved the agencies money, and kept the facility’s
footprint within planned parameters. Most important,
the final GWRS expansion enabled 100% of OC San’s re-
claimable wastewater flow to be recycled—a long-sought
milestone—and the total capacity is now enough to satisfy
the needs of one million people. (The accompanying side-
bar, “California’s GWRS Timeline,” provides a snapshot of
OCWD and OC San’s evolution.)
The treatment process includes microfiltration, reverse
osmosis (RO), and ultraviolet light with hydrogen perox-
ide. After treatment, the water either infiltrates into local
aquifers through recharge basins located in Anaheim,
Calif., or it is injected through various wells near the
coast. From the regulatory framework of indirect reuse,
the recycled water needs the buffer provided by the aqui-
fers before it can serve as a source for drinking water.
The Microfiltration Challenge
When design work began for the final expansion of the
GWRS, analysis determined that the footprint for the
new facilities was less than optimal if the plant used the
same type of microfiltration membranes. To address this,
the project teams initiated full-scale tests of two new
types of membranes that would require fewer units and
less space as a result of increased efficiency.
The microfiltration membrane design also considered
the quality of wastewater that would be used for recy-
cling at the expanded facilities. Pre-expansion, the GWRS
took its wastewater from OC San’s Plant No. 1 in Fountain
Valley, Calif., next to the GWRS facility. The final expan-
sion would mix in wastewater effluent from Plant No. 2,
which is 3 miles away in Huntington Beach, Calif. Plant No.
2’s water had a lower quality for recycling purposes, due to
its tributary collection system being adjacent to the ocean,
which created higher total dissolved solids and increased
ammonia and alkalinity in the influent; therefore, new
types of microfiltration membranes were examined.
CALIFORNIA’S GWRS TIMELINE
1933
The Orange County Water District is established.
1954
The Orange County Sanitation District (OC San) is
established.
1975
Water Factory 21, a water reclamation and desalting
facility and a precursor to the GWRS, begins producing
15 mgd of water.
2004
Groundbreaking takes place for the GWRS, which will
become the world’s largest water purification facility.
2008
The GWRS comes on line, producing 70 mgd of water.
2015
The initial expansion of the GWRS is completed,
increasing its capacity to 100 mgd.
2018
The GWRS produces 100,008,000 gallons in 24 hours,
setting a Guinness World Record for most wastewater
recycled into drinking water in a day.
2020
Construction begins on the final expansion of the GWRS.
2022
The GWRS receives wastewater from OC San Plant
No. 2, enabling it to recycle 100% of reclaimable
wastewater flows.
2023
The final 30-mgd expansion of the GWRS is completed
and dedicated, increasing total capacity to 130 mgd,
enough to serve one million people.
GWRS—groundwater replenishment system
15518833, 2025, 3, Downloaded from https://awwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/awwa.2419, Wiley Online Library on [19/03/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
FEATURE Groundwater Replenishment in California
JOURNAL AWWA • APRIL 2025 45
OCWD staff put the two newer polyvinylidene fluoride
(PVDF) membranes into full-scale cells, testing them and
collecting data for more than six months. These full-scale
tests supported procurement of the best-fit design to
handle the potential for high-fouling influent.
Once operations staff saw the effectiveness, they com-
petitively bid the membranes; the testing and selection
process saved the district $8 million over what was bud-
geted. The use of more chemically tolerant PVDF micro-
filtration membranes reduces the frequency of cleanings
and extends the service life of the membranes.
OCWD implemented a universal design for the micro-
filtration membrane system that could fit several types
of membranes, giving it flexibility in membrane selection
during the bidding process. This innovative design also
kept the expansion plans moving forward, even if all the
specifics weren’t yet finalized. Considering the space
limitations of the expanded plant, the delivery system
for chlorine, which is used for PVDF membrane cleaning,
was located in two separate areas at the GWRS to ease
chemical deliveries by trucks.
Repurposing a Little-Used Pipeline
Since the GWRS expansion would use wastewater from
a new source, a suitable pipeline was needed to link the
facilities. Three pipelines already connected OC Sans
Plant No. 1 (next to the GWRS) and Plant No. 2, and one
of the pipelines—a full 66 inches in diameter—was a
little-used overflow line. This line was originally built
in 1957, and after it was rebuilt with a new liner, it
would serve as the connector. Since the GWRS is uphill
from Plant No. 2, the rebuild was especially critical as
the line was changing from being gravity-driven to a
pressure line.
The 3-mile conveyance pipeline was relined with
fiberglass-reinforced plastic as part of a process consist-
ing of digging numerous “launch pits” along the route,
inserting the liner in a special mechanism and pushing it
through the pipeline to the next launch pit. Aside from a
few locations that required a steel liner for short distanc-
es, fiberglass-reinforced plastic was used throughout.
Relining gave the pipeline a second life and avoided
the challenges of trenching and tunneling a new pipeline
through a narrow right-of-way. In addition, the relining
process and the pipe’s large diameter are expected to re-
duce energy needs, ultimately saving $200,000 annually.
Interstage Boosting at RO Units
The expansion project closely examined the existing
facilities to determine whether upgrades or modifica-
tions were needed. When it came to the RO system, the
higher salt content in the new wastewater source meant
higher operating pressures. So rather than pumping the
water through all three RO stages using a single feed
pump, whereby the flow would be weaker at the end than
the beginning, an interstage booster pump was added
between the first and second stages to help balance the
flow and ultimately use less energy.
Interstage boosting was installed on the six new RO
units (each rated at 5 mgd) and retrofitted into the orig-
inal 15 units. This new system maintains the flows and
balances production, allowing the plant to achieve longer
run times between membrane cleanings. In addition,
flowmeters were installed on all stages of the units to
better track and analyze performance. Achieving more
constant flow should save more than $10 million in ener-
gy costs over the lifespan of the equipment while main-
taining an 85% recovery rate through the RO units.
Monte Carlo Simulations
Key parameters considered when designing a water recy-
cling system included temperatures, total dissolved sol-
ids, amount of salt, and the organic materials in the
water. A series of Monte Carlo simulations were used to
screen a variety of data from more than 1,000 scenarios
to determine the most probable water quality, which sub-
sequently guided the selection of equipment, pumps, and
pressure lines.
Treatment for the final expansion was designed using
the statistical analysis from Monte Carlo projections for
influent water quality. Ultimately, the design used the
95th percentile of quality to ensure the system wasn’t
over-designed for the occasional times when quality was
worse than expected. This simply means that during
those occasions, the plant wouldn’t produce as much
water for a short period.
Equalization Tanks
During the latest GWRS expansion, some key modi-
fications were taking place at OC San’s Plant No. 2 to
better optimize its performance. For instance, the RO
membranes are best operated at a constant feed rate
rather than a variable flow. Wastewater systems have
more activity during the day and less activity at night,
so to achieve a constant flow, OCWD installed two large
flow-equalization tanks for Plant No. 2; now the RO units
can hum along at a constant pace and keep production
going at maximum capacity. Flow-equalization tanks
were installed during the initial expansion at the GWRS
plant in 2015, and now the practice of using them before
RO treatment has become a common practice.
Other improvements at Plant No. 2 included the in-
stallation of a weir in the existing pipe. Instead of using
a pump station for the tanks, the water was intercepted
15518833, 2025, 3, Downloaded from https://awwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/awwa.2419, Wiley Online Library on [19/03/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
FEATURE Groundwater Replenishment in California
46 JOURNAL AWWA • APRIL 2025
much closer to the tanks and held with a new weir, saving
several thousand feet of piping. This configuration still
gives operators the option of allowing the treated water
from OC San to flow to the ocean for discharge if needed.
Treatment System Modifications
Plant No. 2 processes contain certain significant industrial
flows that are considered non-reclaimable; these must be
processed through a separate treatment train from the
GWRS-bound reclaimable flows for ocean outfall disposal.
The challenge was that Plant No. 2 was not designed to han-
dle separate treatment trains. The biggest area of concern
was the 340-mgd headworks facility, which includes flow
metering, screens, influent pumping, and grit removal.
OC San addressed this problem by dividing the existing
headworks facility into two treatment trains: reclaimable
and non-reclaimable, while maintaining 24-7 operations
at this critical facility. Adding to the complexity was the
requirement that the system could be recombined during
extreme wet-weather events.
The project team identified several integrated ap-
proaches, including new infrastructure, modifications
to existing equipment, and operational changes to allow
the headworks to serve the three process configurations.
New elements were installed to facilitate the separation
and recombining of the headworks facility:
A new 75-inch diversion pipe
Highly customized steel pipe fittings
A vortex structure
Seventeen large stainless-steel slide gates installed in
extremely constrained locations
New influent pumps were required to accommodate
the reduced flow on the non-reclaimable side, as was a
complete reprogramming of the headworks supervisory
control and data acquisition system to reconfigure the
extensive operational modifications.
Proceeding Despite the Pandemic
The final expansion of the GWRS was completed ahead
of schedule, despite construction taking place during the
COVID-19 pandemic and despite resulting supply-
chain disruptions worldwide. While many sectors were
locked down, this project was declared an essential pub-
lic service, so it was allowed to move forward. Social dis-
tancing, wearing masks, and other safety practices were
observed by all parties.
Among many COVID-related supply-chain issues, the
fiber-reinforced plastic piping needed to reline the 3-mile
conveyance pipe idled on ships offshore for a consider-
able time. Dozens of ships visible from the facility were
forced to wait for weeks to get into the Los Angeles or
Long Beach ports to unload. And while those shipping
issues prolonged the pipe relining, they didn’t delay the
final expansion’s debut.
Building Trust and Water Independence
The GWRS brings extraordinary water sustainability and
resilience to the Orange County Groundwater Basin, the
primary potable water supply for more than 2.5 million
people. Since its inception in 2008, the GWRS has pro-
duced more than 400 billion gallons of high-quality
water, building public trust along the way and demon-
strating the benefits of advanced water purification tech-
nologies. Even better, the plants success has further
reduced the need to import water from the Colorado
River or the State Water Project, which is a series of water
supply canals coming from Northern California.
Leaders from the OCWD, OC San, and Black & Veatch
worked closely throughout this project to fortify the
reliability of local drinking water supply and reduce the
region’s dependence on water imports. This collaboration
advanced many new water reclamation techniques, mak-
ing the regions water customers the biggest winners.
About the Authors
James H. Clark is senior vice president at
Black & Veatch, Los Angeles, Calif.;
ClarkJH@bv.com.
Jeff Neemann is west managing director for Black &
Veatch, Irvine, Calif.
Mehul Patel is executive director of operations for the
Orange County Water District, Fountain Valley, Calif.
Robert Thompson is general manager of the Orange
County Sanitation District, Fountain Valley, Calif.
https://doi.org/10.1002/awwa.2419
AWWA Resources
OneWater Nevada Advances A+ Water Recycling Project.
Teel L, Sundram V. 2024. Journal AWWA. 116:8:68. https://
doi.org/10.1002/awwa.2339
Tapping Tomorrow: Houston’s Water Prospects for the
Next Century. Kommineni S, Petersen T, Bartlett J, et al.
2023. Journal AWWA. 115:8:36. https://doi.org/10.1002
/awwa.2161
Are Utilities Ready for Advanced Water Treatment
Operator Training? Soltau S. 2024. Opflow. 50:6:6. https://
doi.org/10.1002/opfl.1975
These resources have been supplied by Journal AWWA staff.
For information on these and other AWWA resources, visit
www.awwa.org.
15518833, 2025, 3, Downloaded from https://awwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/awwa.2419, Wiley Online Library on [19/03/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License